Saw this at Michelle Malkin and really juxtaposes the far left and the juvenile.
I don't believe there should be any censorship related to this "art," but I believe there also shouldn't be any censorship of the responses that this "artist" receives.
You want to make inflammatory art, then live with the results. Good lesson in life for those that think that this type of thing should be protected from comment or criticism.
You want to make inflammatory art, then live with the results. Good lesson in life for those that think that this type of thing should be protected from comment or criticism.
1 comment:
Clearly, our schools are doing a bad job of teaching what the First Amendment really means. Too many people seem to think it means freedom from repurcussions, period. Sorry, it just means freedom from repurcussions from the Government. Gov't officials won't come and burn your art, and you won't be arrested. But the rest of us still retain OUR freedom of speech too. So we get to express our opinions, and can choose to burn the Dixie Chicks CD's as OUR artistic expression in response.
The left needs to grow a skin. That, and the ability to reason.
Post a Comment