Thursday, September 28, 2006

More NIE Analysis

Caught this mentioned at Wizbang. They quote the best part, so I'll quote it as well. Not sure how accurate this is, but it is a thought provoking point of view.
This was written by committee. It contains something for everyone and avoids any clear statements that might prove wrong. How was the press so absurdly misled?

Anybody who has ever experienced bureaucratic infighting will understand immediately what happened. Someone inserted the silly sentence about the Iraq conflict breeding resentment precisely so it could be wrenched out of context and leaked. That someone wanted to reinforce the Democrats' argument that they are fit to lead despite all their anti war foolishness.

The NIE doesn't say that the war in Iraq is counterproductive but that must be what a significant part of our intelligence apparatus believes. If not, the NIE's Key Judgments would probably never have speculated about resentment in the Muslim world and any such speculation would certainly never have seen the light of day. Some, at least, of our intelligence experts are antiwar moonbats.

Given the track record those experts have compiled, Democrats shouldn't be so eager to rely on any of them. Anyone who is tempted to take seriously what intelligence experts have to say about the strategic consequences of fighting in Iraq should take a lesson from the Ghost of Intelligence Past.

And everyone has to have heard that the Dems want the full report released.
"The American people deserve the full story, not those parts of it that the Bush administration selects," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass.
Ted shouldn't get his panties in a twist, he merely needs to wait a couple of days and it will be leaked to the NYTimes. Secrets be damned. Not to mention the political win they get by being able to declare the President is holding information that the people have a right to.

Oh, and the Dems are bitching about the Iraq report:
A separate high-level assessment focused solely on Iraq may be coming soon. At least two House Democrats - Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California and Rep. Jane Harman of California - have questioned whether that report has been stamped "draft" and shelved until after the Nov. 7 elections.

An intelligence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the process, said National Intelligence Director John Negroponte told lawmakers in writing only one month ago that he ordered a new Iraq estimate to be assembled. The estimate on terrorism released Tuesday took about a year to produce.

I'm sure that one will make it into the public view, at least those portions that are convenient for Democrats political interests.

It makes me wonder why no one is being prosecuted for all these leaks.

1 comment:

geekwife said...

I agree, I am SHOCKED that no one is being prosecuted for these leaks, given that Bush lives to punish those in his administration who dare to disagree with him. And given that Bush/Rove have complete and total control over everything. Perhaps Rove is slipping? Maybe he's too busy manipulating gas prices to deal with this?

I'll have to ask the big liberal in my life - I'm sure she can explain it to me.